Talk:Typographer (typewriter)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Psiĥedelisto (talk · contribs) 06:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one, about a topic I know a thing or two about. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 06:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Coldwell: I have two main concerns before promotion. First, the lead of this article is not sufficiently long and does not adequately summarize the article. (MOS:INTRO, WP:SS, WP:GA?#1) Second, the copyright status of all the now deleted Flickr images by clbinelli is questionable. They clearly are scans and not own-work photos. Where did they actually come from, and how can we prove they're actually suitable for Wikipedia? (WP:GA?#6a) Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 18:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

• @Psiĥedelisto: Removed Flickr images from article. Expanded lead. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Very good job on this article, thanks for writing it. My concerns have been adequately addressed and I'm happy to pass it. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 21:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I know that you simply chose to remove the images, but it would be nice future work to try to figure out their source, if their source is public domain, and add them back with correct sourcing information.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: