Talk:U-Pass BC

POV

I found the following paragraph a tad biased. It has a bit of a negitive tone towards TransLink's "insert your pass into the box" regulation.

"There have been complaints from students (including a recent editorial in the Ubyssey, one of UBC's student newspapers) that the official policy--which states that each U-Pass must be inserted into the farebox on each trip, except at the discretion of the operator--is inconsistently applied. While most drivers simply wave U-Pass holders onto the bus, some drivers insist that each pass be inserted. Some students argue that this is an unnecessary inconvenience, since Translink cannot accumulate any useful ridership information via the U-Pass as it is only inserted into bus fareboxes (and not scanned for boarding SkyTrain or the SeaBus), and only at the request of a few drivers system-wide. It is further argued that requiring each U-Pass holder to insert his or her pass into the farebox slows boarding time and causes bottlenecks at the front of the bus. This is especially frustrating when riders are simultaneously allowed to board via the rear doors without any inspection of their passes."

Any one else's comments? -- Selmo 21:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed - I don't even think the item is worth mentioning, for that matter. "each U-Pass must be inserted into the farebox on each trip, except at the discretion of the operator" - sounds like the operators are exercising their discretion... I'd say move the text in question to the talk page, and see if anyone can come up with something to make this "tempest in a teapot" relevant to the article. --Ckatz^chat_spy 01:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

In fact, the other paragraphs describe the cause of the issues that are described in the that paragraph, so I am deleting it. -- Yuhong 08:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Contradiction

The following sentence "all students are obliged to purchase the pass, though in some cases students may opt out" contradicts itself. Can someone who knows which is correct please edit it? (In other words, either all students are obliged to purchase the pass, or they are not.) Stifle (talk) 09:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

The Pass is universally charged- meaing all students are obliged to pay. There was however, a feeling that this could be a "regressive tax," and that some students would be unable to afford it, and so an appeals committee was set up within the AMS, the UBC student association, to hear from students who wish "to opt out" and can demonstrate extenuating circumstances.

This issue seems to have been resolved quite a long time ago, but the tag was never removed. It was originally placed in this article: 09:48, 17 September 2006 Stifle. The entire section has been rewriten since that time.

If you still feel the article is in contradiction, please add a fresh tag with an explanation in this discussion section. Thanks so much for all the hard work on this article. Kjnelan (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Possible Citation

Hi all, not sure how citations work, but here is a reference to the Ubyssey online about the U pass. http://www.ubyssey.bc.ca/2007/02/06/u-pass-expansion-a-no-go-until-2008/ Kaw in stl 22:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

It has been added, thank you. You may also wish to consider visiting WP:CITE#HOW to learn how to add proper referencing to articles.Luke! 23:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:UPass 2008.gif

Image:UPass 2008.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)