Talk:U.S.–Japan Alliance

Map

User Bourenane Chahine keeps reposting a map they made of the alliance which is nothing more than Japan and the United States colored in. This map is not useful and does not provide any information other than the locations of Japan and the United States on a map. It also has a confusing and extraneous large blue square near Africa that the user cannot explain. They have engaged in edit warring to keep reposting the map without any changes. I can't keep reverting it any more because of edit warring rules which they seem intent on ignoring. At this point it is bordering on vandalism, and an administrator may need to step in. --Ash-Gaar (talk) 08:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Someone is deliberately trying to destroy my work

User Ash-Gaar keeps deleting my work, i have created a map that cover the territories of japan us military alliance, user Ash-Gaar insist on deleting it, i have addressed all of his concern in private, in his page, he have replied to none of my messages, the map is useful for the people that want to know where those two countries is located, the user Ash-Gaar doesn't seem to understand that nor everybody know where countries are situated on a map, the bleu scare is for the color of japan and the united states, to differentiate them from the others countries that are not covered by the treaty. the user have been engaging in edit warring to keep deleting my work without valide reason, only because he doesn't like my map, for superficial and subjective reason, please my an administrator resolve this work, it's bordering harassement and vandalism.

you may also notice that in each Wikipedia page that page a treaty of mutual defense, there is map of the country part of the treaty. like in the English nato page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO or inthe AUKUS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUKUS Bourenane Chahine (talk) 08:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your map is not as clean and easy to read as those maps, those maps involve more than just two countries, and those maps don't have a random, extraneous square off the coast of Africa, at a location entirely unrelated to the countries involved. --Ash-Gaar (talk) 08:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

It is easy to read, but i will make another one that is even more easier to read for people like you, and no there are article that have map that have only two countries i will prove it to you right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Defense_Treaty_(United_States%E2%80%93Philippines) Bourenane Chahine (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

The only reason that article has a map is because you added it. I recommend that you discuss future images here first before adding them directly to the article. — Czello ^(music) 09:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Anyone that doesn't hava a bad faith or an very low IQ would get that the square represent the color of those two countries Bourenane Chahine (talk) 08:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

@Bourenane Chahine: Your last comment could be interpreted as a personal attack. Please do not speak to other users like that and remain WP:CIVIL. Given that you're edit warring (and no, your images are not clear - in fact that appear to be rather messy), you're looking a block if you resume. — Czello ^(music) 09:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Are you an administrator, or his personal friend that have come to help him ?

May you answer in good faith. Bourenane Chahine (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

I am neither, just another editor. — Czello ^(music) 09:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for you answer.

i will abide by the majority then.

this article shall have no map in it. Bourenane Chahine (talk) 09:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

"You are not addressing any of the concerns I raised. You are just edit warring. At this point, this is just vandalism, and you are proving to be the troll I feared you were.)"

here is one of his other lie, i have addressed his concern on his page, until i saw that there was no answer back to me, therefore i stopped, and of course being accused of being a troll and not a genuine editor. Bourenane Chahine (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Then what do you think about that comment "Not sure if this is good faith or just trolling, but this map is entirely unhelpful" couldn't that be considered as personnel attack as well ? this was his first comment on my edit, and his first undo on my work, this is not a language that you can use when speaking to someone else that you don't know, he though i had ban intention since the very beginning. therefore i replied to him with the correct tone that suited that kind of reply. Bourenane Chahine (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)