This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Most of these vessels never saw actual naval service and were transferred at launch to the Army for operation by the Corps of Engineers in port rehabilitation. Their inclusion among USN vessels is for most only a technicality of their sponsorship during construction. Only two, USNS ''Sagitta'' (T-AK-87) and USNS Vela (AK-89) returned to USN. Some never even fulfilled the port rehabilitation duty as delays in conversion pushed their activation beyond a useful date. For details of the rather confused history of the port repair ships see United States Army in World War II - The Corps of Engineers: Troops and Equipment - Chapter XVII - Preparing to Reconstruct Ports.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In official documents these ships are always "Engineer port repair ships" as the ships operated entirely under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with combat engineer crews. Transportation Corps was responsible for obtaining the ships, Army modifications in shipyards and ship operating crew training but not operation. The use of U.S. Army Transport (USAT) is never indicated, though no explicit designation is given. Many ships not designated U.S.A.T. simply carried U. S. Army (name/number). Photos and official text do not support the "USAPRS" prefix, though it is a handy usage distinction. Palmeira (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply