Talk:U.S. European Command State Partnership Program

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Plagiarism problem

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Either the DoD relies heavily of Wikipedia editors for their writing or there seems to be an unacceptable level of plagiarism of the DoD by the Wikipedia editors. I don't think the DoD cares much because it serves to disseminate their concepts more widely but we should care. What is the point of repeating a DoD article in a WP article? In this article I think I can resolve it by the use of the quotation mark and additional references. The refs in this article are mainly all dead links anyway, naturally, because they all use dated DoD sites. So, I plan to use much of what is there but in quotes.Botteville (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic