Talk:U.S. Route 491/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Prose is generally great. Just one comment. As the highway gains altitude the highway passes through large Pinto bean farming regions. Try to cut down on the use of "the highway".

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I know the route is pretty boring (route description wise), but I'd like to see the RD expanded some. Especially for the New Mexico section, you should write the intersections, towns passed, and I think it crosses the San Juan River.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

An excellent article overall, but there are some minor issues. I've placed the article on-hold for theses issues to be addressed. Cheers, Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. While searching for you requested more information on the New Mexico portion, I found a rather interesting document from the NM DOT about the fatality rates since renumbering. I have incorporated this into the History section. Please advise if I have erred in this content addition or if you feel this would be more appropriate in a different section. Thanks again, I believe this is ready for you to finish the evaluation.Dave (talk) 05:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)