Talk:U2 360° Tour/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Numbermaniac in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 23:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have decided to review this article. This will be expanded as I review it. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 23:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I really like this one.  

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    This looks line a decent pass.

-- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 06:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pass! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 07:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply