Talk:U2 concert in Sarajevo/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Annalise in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Annalise (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Hi, I'm going to be reviewing this article over the next few days.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- My only concern is about the set list: the manual of style says that lists should only be included if they cannot be integrated into the prose, and it seems like the set list is already well-integrated. I have more details in the section on images.
- And those are fixed!
- My only concern is about the set list: the manual of style says that lists should only be included if they cannot be integrated into the prose, and it seems like the set list is already well-integrated. I have more details in the section on images.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Looks good.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Everything seems fine to me, but I don't know very much about the Bosnian War, so I wouldn't be surprised if there was something related to that that I didn't catch.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Most of the images look good, and although it would be nice to have an actual image of the concert, I can understand if that isn't possible. I'm a little confused, though, about the set list image. I don't think that it's necessary to have both the set list in text and in an image. Honestly, I think the section above the lists goes over the songs that were played quite well.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- The image was originally included since it showed that the band had considered playing an additional song, but that it did not make the setlist. I agree with your comments though, so I've integrated it into the prose instead and removed both the setlist section and the image. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 02:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, okay, that makes SO much more sense. I figured it was something like that, but I'm glad you fixed it. The article looks much better now. Annalise (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- The image was originally included since it showed that the band had considered playing an additional song, but that it did not make the setlist. I agree with your comments though, so I've integrated it into the prose instead and removed both the setlist section and the image. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 02:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- And it looks like everything's good. Congratulations!
- Pass/Fail: