Talk:UB.109T
Latest comment: 1 year ago by LilianaUwU in topic Citation 7 page number inaccuracy
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UB.109T article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from UB.109T appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that development of the British UB.109T cruise missile was given "super-priority" in 1951 to ward off an expected attack by the Soviet Union, only to be cancelled after the attack never came? Source: Forbat, chapter 2 (ebook, no page numbers)
- ALT1: ... that the Vickers UB.109T cruise missile was designed to replace manned bombers but was made redundant by a manned bomber from the same company? Source: same, last page of the chapter
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nathalie_Viteri
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 20:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC).
New enough and large enough expansion. QPQ present. Maury Markowitz, you might be interested in learning about the |adj=parameter of {{convert}}, given that several areas needed it. I can't access the full book, but I saw a preview to verify ALT0. Both hooks are interesting. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Citation 7 page number inaccuracy
editCitation 7 on this page, High Stakes, Britain's Air Arms In Action 1945-1990 by Vic Flintham has an incorrect page number. While the page references page 273 as the origins of the information referenced, the correct page would be page 141.
I'd correct this myself but cannot alter the citations, so if someone would be willing to change them to be more accurate I would be very thankful!
Thanks for reading! Unbased (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Done. It took me a minute to figure it out, but I did it. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
