Talk:UFC 169
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Beansy in topic Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UFC 169 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2014
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
update the goddamn page!!!!!!!!!!!!! 99.246.220.139 (talk) 06:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. As far as I can see, the article is updated. Please make future requests in the form of "change X to Y" so editors can easily determine what you wish to be changed. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 16:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- I would guess from the section title that the implied request was for the page itself to be given semi-protection against vandalism. This commonly occurs to UFC pages for some of the larger events around the time an event occurs (most commonly just cutesy things in the results tables) and usually dissipates within a day or so afterward unless something really controversial occurs. For non-veteran editors and non-admins reading this: to the best of my knowledge even temporary protection is a request that usually has to be made several days in advance unless you're an administrator. I don't really think it's an issue for this page at this point, nor something regular editors can't handle here, and if I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will put in a request properly. Beansy (talk) 19:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
