This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Branton Files was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 October 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into UFO conspiracy theories. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The APFN does not appear to be a reliable source yet it is the sole source currently supporting the material about Phil Schneider, it seems. —PaleoNeonate – 02:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Adding: he seems to be a rather obscure person, except as part of some conspiracy theorist and extremist circles like the Patriot Movement, making it difficult to find better sources. The claims themselves are rehashed discredited UFO conspiracy theories from that tradition, making any of his personal testimonies dubious as well... It's unclear if he used his real name, if he was amateur enthusiast (perhaps with psychiatric issues, apparently he ultimately suicided) or paid promoter. What is clear is that it was nonsense and very political (other than entertained starting from a few selected and reinterpreted facts, of course)... —PaleoNeonate – 16:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Google search Schneider + Dulce and lots of non-RS tabloids and UFO enthusiast books turn up with mentions of Schneider supposedly witnessing or being told of a battle between aliens and humans in a secret underground base. Here is the least fringy source I could find, a book by a paranormal writer who is somewhat skeptical and published by McFarland & Company. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
It doesn't seem very critical to me, but at least it's not transcripts on an advocacy website. It also seems to include more details. Thanks again for your work on Wikipedia BTW, we meet less these days, as I'm rarely active. —PaleoNeonate – 23:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Gladly self-reverted -- the intent was to immediately add a second source linking the obit to the folklore, but I got interrupted. Upon reflection, even well-sourced it wouldn't really be an improvement. Feoffer (talk) 06:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Along with problems related to dubious sourcing, this article contains a lot of content that has nothing to do with conspiracy theories per se. Simply listing alleged UFO sightings and assuming an underlying conspiracy is inappropriate WP:OR. I'm beginning to remove such off-topic content, along with material attached to non-WP:FRIND sources. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
A lot of dubious sourcing remains in this article. The writing is quite good, but is it reasonable or appropriate for an encyclopedia article to depend so heavily on pro-conspiracy organizations/authors as sources for conspiracy theories? Perhaps this article should include only notable UFO-related conspiracies directly covered by WP:FRIND sources. Reasonable minds might, of course, disagree about that, so please share your opinions here. I might also take this issue/question to FTN. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don’t think we need to be laundry listing every single claim made by Ufologist types to get the point across on what a ufo conspiracy theory is. I also concur that the article should shy away from overtly fixating on the simple belief in UFOs as alien in origin- the actual meat and potatoes is the belief that “the government” is actively hovering it up. Paragon Deku (talk) 01:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
