Talk:UHF Follow-On satellite
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on UFO (satellite). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228081235/http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/factsheets/601/uhf_followon/uhf_followon.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/factsheets/601/uhf_followon/uhf_followon.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 22 April 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to UHF follow-on satellite (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 00:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Ultra High Frequency Follow-On → UHF follow-on system – This descriptive title seems more appropriate than the several over-capitalized proper-name-like titles that have been tried here. The current title seems particularly uncommon in sources, and with the more common UHF, caps do not dominate enough wrt the threshold of MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Or satellite – UHF follow-on satellite is most common in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 04:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support move to UHF follow-on satellite. Used in sources and far more recognisable. Ticks all the boxes. Andrewa (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Ultra High Frequency Follow-On is the actual name of the satellite system, like Advanced Extremely High Frequency (the U.S. sucks at naming satellite systems. Most reputable sources I’ve seen from a quick google search seem to use that verbiage. (N-gram results are also from so long ago I’m not sure how reliable they would be for this to establish COMMONNAME). Garuda28 (talk) 04:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: By the actual name I guess you mean the one used in primary sources. We do consider these, but they do not take precedence over others to say the least. The policy is that secondary sources take precedence. Andrewa (talk) 16:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support UHF follow-on satellite. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Although he didn't close this discussion, DarkGlow already implemented the move according to consensus. (t · c) buidhe 00:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: Thanks for closing it. I completely forgot to add closure templates as I had a phone call while performing the moves. Thanks again! – DarkGlow • 08:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)