Talk:USCGC Bertholf

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jjjjjjdddddd in topic POV tag

Formatting

edit

Note the section "edit" boxes are all slammed to bottom due to the photo placements I guess ...Billymac00 (talk) 23:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kick out NSC program stuff

edit

Can all program (rather than ship) related sections be kicked out to the National Security Cutter page please? Hcobb (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on USCGC Bertholf (WMSL-750). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on USCGC Bertholf (WMSL-750). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

POV tag

edit

I tagged it for POV because it reads like an advertisement in places. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps in a place or two. I'll work on that angle. I would advise you to not tag an article like you did this one without explaining the article's deficiencies on the article talk page. I understand that anyone can do this, but the instructions for the POV tag tell you that it is advisable to explain your action on the talk page. Give me a week or so to smooth this article out and if it still doesn't seem right, the by all means tag it... Thank you for your reply to my revert. Happy Holidays... Cuprum17 (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that's fair. I neglected to use the talk page the first time, and thanks for fixing up the article. Happy Holidays, Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply