Talk:USRC Active

A fact from USRC Active appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 340 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the ten Revenue Marine cutters authorized by the U.S. Congress in 1790 – including the Vigilant, Active, General Green, Massachusetts, Scammel, South Carolina and Eagle – comprised the U.S. Federal government's first "armed force afloat"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/January.

Wikipedia

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States SIA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

SIA

This article has been rated as SIA-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Proposed deletion of this shipindex disambig page would be counterproductive

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Someone has proposed deletion of this page because only one of its entries has an article so far. But Wikipedia has many shipindex disambigs that are lists of ships -- see many of the Royal Navy shipindex disambigs starting with "HMS" -- and these shipindex disambigs are themselves informational because they show the Wikipedia user what ships historically had a given name, when those ships existed, and what types of ships they were. Not retaining lists like this misleads Wikipedia users by making them think only one ship exists when many did, and may make them misidentify a ship. Finally, note that a first step in filling Wikipedia's missing ship articles is to identify the totality of ships with a name, so that articles will written. In due course I plan to fill in this list by creating articles for the ships; in the meantime, it benefits users to known how many ships of the name existed and when they existed, which is what this and all other Wikipedia shipindex disambigs do, and f the list spurs others to add in articles on the missing ships, so much the better. Deletion of this shipindex disambig or any others like it would be misguided and counterproductive; it is hard to understand how such deletions would help in any way. Mdnavman (talk) 04:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)mdnavmanReply

Add topic