 | USS Ampere has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 11, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Ampere article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Table of Commanders
editDoes the table really need to be sortable?Pennsy22 (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Ampere/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 19:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
I'll do this in the next couple of days. Although at first read it looks a bit skimpy for GA....auntieruth (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sources
- I'm not liking the way your citations are listed. There is no author, no date of the page, (different from Accessed on...) It's not possible to evaluate the veracity of sources (citations and bib) the way you have them listed. See, for example, USS_Chicago_(CA-136).
- They use SFN refs. If you look at bibliography you will see both sources. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- What does degaussing mean? I understand what it is, but how did a ship do that? Were there others? What did they do?
Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm asking for a second opinion on content for this. auntieruth (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)