Talk:USS Harding (DD-91)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Tomobe03 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Harding (DD-91)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
  • No DAB links (no action required)
  • No duplicate links (no action required)
  • External links in order (no action required)
  • Performed several minor edits (typos, one article change, missing diacritics or spacing - no action required)

All GACR met. Passing.