Talk:USS John F. Kennedy (CVN-79)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Wilderness?

Is there any source on this business about Wilderness? Whalepelt 19:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

There is no source and very little credibility to it — I think someone is blowing smoke up our discharge ports. A few minutes later: A little walk through the history shows that the claim was added by an anonymous editor who has made no (0) other contributions. I have deleted it completely. ➥the Epopt 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Replacement?

Wouldnt this be replacing the USS John F Kennedy rather than a nimitz class carrier — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.2.166.148 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

The ship will be replacing the USS Enterpise CV-65 when it is finally built.Reb1981 (talk) 00:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Improve this article

Could somebody improve this articles? The reason is that this articles possibly contains tentative informations. Daniel 5127 01:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

The picture for this article and the CVN-78 article are identicle, captions are different though. possibly erronous "artist impression" of the cvn-79 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.95.72.245 (talk) 14:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Naming

The citation for the Arizona name fell off the Congressman's website after 3 years, and instead of getting tagged with a "citation needed" was deleted outright. This is wrong -- it was a cited point and a replacement was found in about two minutes by using Google. I have put up a new citation -- the actual letter from the Congressman to the Secretary of the Navy. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Poor image

The image

really doesn't add anything to the article. I can't find any reason for it to remain. The carrier depicted is the USS Abraham Lincoln, a Nimitz-class vessel. What's the point? Dziban303 (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Improper use of "PCU" in ship name

"PCU" is not a prefix and is not part of the official or common name of a vessel, and should not be used on Wikipedia articles in ways that imply that it is. Please see the detailed discussion of this issue on the USS Gerald R. Ford talk page. Shelbystripes (talk) 20:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on USS John F. Kennedy (CVN-79). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529013300/http://www.defense.gov//news/newsarticle.aspx?id=63635 to http://www.defense.gov/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100705105503/http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com:80/about/assets/Newport_News_Facts.pdf to http://www.sb.northropgrumman.com/about/assets/Newport_News_Facts.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Archive 1