Talk:USS Roanoke (1855)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Roanoke (1855)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HueSatLum (talk · contribs) 02:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

• Standardize month abbreviations (e.g. Mar ↔ March)
• [[President]] → [[President of Nicaragua|President]]
• "Pilothouse" (or "Pilot-house") seems to be the proper spelling.
• Add {{convert}} for "nine inches" and "one-inch plates"
  • All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Minor prose issues cleaned up above

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I'm assuming that some refs are for entire paragraphs.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   It's hard to be biased with this topic

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Two appropriate public domain images

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Nicely done. HueSatLum 23:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)