Talk:USS West Corum

Latest comment: 16 years ago by The ed17 in topic GA Review
Good articleUSS West Corum has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 29, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:USS West Corum (ID-3982)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello! I'll have the full review up in an hour or two....(my roommate's dad is coming up, so I might have to get moving, take a shower, etc.) Cheers! —the_ed1717:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    no pictures in article
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    any possible photo for a ship that was part of the same class as the West Corum?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    on hold


Just two issues...a photo of a similar boat? (above) Also, this sentence: "...the ship was renamed USAT Will H. Point (though some sources indicate William H. Point instead) in honor of a former officer in the Quartermaster Corps.[17]" Which sources indicate what? Cheers! —the_ed1718:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've found two photos of Will H. Point at the Australian War Memorial site. I'll upload those tomorrow and add to the article. I'll post here when that's done. — Bellhalla (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Images added to article. — Bellhalla (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Beautiful! —the_ed1717:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Any references for notes 2 & 3? —the_ed1718:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Notes 2 and 3 are each from the refs immediately preceding them. If you think it better that the notes explicitly have reference info in them, I'll add to each. — Bellhalla (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I simply added the ref numbers...(there should be something there)...if that's not enough in your opinion, feel free to add the name of the ref to the notes or something of the like. Cheers! —the_ed1717:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply