Talk:Ubuntu (typeface)
Latest comment: 4 days ago by ToBeFree in topic "Raleway" listed at Redirects for discussion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ubuntu (typeface) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Out of date tag
editAn editor has tagged this as "out pf date", but hasn't indicated why this is the case. Some indication of what is missing or wrong is required to fix this. - Ahunt (talk) 11:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- My apologies for not indicating what’s out-of-date. We need to include details about the newly released Ubuntu Monospace and Condensed variants, as well as the timeline of expected releases. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 20 August, 2011 [11:28]
- Okay, thanks for explaining that. I don't suppose you have a ref that indicates the information so it can be added? - Ahunt (talk) 12:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- I found one ref added what I think is the text you are looking for and removed the tag. Please have a look and see if that covers the subject adequately. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. I haven’t found refs other than Ubuntu’s wiki and a tip I sent to OMG! Ubuntu!, but I’ll keep searching. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 20 August, 2011 [13:07]
- I found one ref added what I think is the text you are looking for and removed the tag. Please have a look and see if that covers the subject adequately. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for explaining that. I don't suppose you have a ref that indicates the information so it can be added? - Ahunt (talk) 12:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- That is a worthwhile ref, so I have added it. Do you think more needs to be said, or is is adequately covered now? - Ahunt (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Now the article is much better, thanks! Now I would like to add details about glyph coverage expansion planned in two phases (Dalton Maag’s initial contract and community expansion), but my initial concern is fixed now
Maybe in a day or two I’ll start an article about Dalton Maag. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 20 August, 2011 [13:38]
- Now the article is much better, thanks! Now I would like to add details about glyph coverage expansion planned in two phases (Dalton Maag’s initial contract and community expansion), but my initial concern is fixed now
- That is a worthwhile ref, so I have added it. Do you think more needs to be said, or is is adequately covered now? - Ahunt (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- That would be helpful as long as you have some third party refs to show notability. Have a look at WP:CORP as well to see what you need for refs and such. - Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Unicode coverage
editcf. Free_UCS_Outline_Fonts#Unicode_coverage or DejaVu_fonts#Unicode_coverage how about it? Echinacin35 (talk) 19:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
SWA
editIs that the Ubuntu font that I see used in the Southwest Airlines livery?
"Raleway" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Raleway has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 24 § Raleway until a consensus is reached. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)