Talk:Udmurt grammar

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 75.72.148.122 in topic Deep review needed

Latinic instead of cyrillic

edit

Many words, that must be in cyrillic, are partially written with latin letters. I.e. these cyrillic letters, that are graphically similar (or even identical) to the cyrillic (e.g. cyrillic Сс, Ее, Аа, Оо and Ӧӧ are similar to latin Cc, Ee, Aa, Oo and Öö) are written with latin graphical (but not by-code) equivalents. This isn't correct and they must be replaced by cyrillc.

Also some errors found, like лыӟӥcькo. The sequence ӟӥ is incorrect 'cause of ӥ may be preceded only by д, з, л, н, с, т (дӥ, зӥ, лӥ, нӥ, сӥ, тӥ respectively). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewboltachev (talkcontribs) 23:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Have

edit

The article claims that having no "have" verb is unique to Finno-Ugric languages. There are many other languages which don't use a "have" structure, see the link. In fact, Proto-Indo-European lacked the "have" structure, and used the dative construction (Latin: mihi est) instead. The "have" verbs in modern European languages are later Sprachbund development.

http://wals.info/feature/117?s=20&v1=c00d&v2=cd00&v3=cf6f&v4=cff0&v5=c000&z4=2997&z5=2996&z1=2999&z2=3000&z3=2998&tg_format=map&lat=5.5&lng=152.58&z=2&t=m

--88.112.193.101 (talk) 19:09, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

A lot of errors

edit

By reading this article I've found a lot of errors:

вapaлэ! talk/speak! must be вералэ

лыӟeм книгa must be лыдӟeм книгa

лыӟемтэ книгa must be лыдӟымтэ книгa

...and so on. It needs to be edited form beginning to end — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewboltachev (talkcontribs) 07:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deep review needed

edit

Encoding error latinic instead of cyrillic was fixed by me. Deep review is needed for now to fix other (non-technical) errors Andrewboltachev (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It appears that some switches back to a latin and cyrillic mix have occurred, particularly ë instead of ё. 75.72.148.122 (talk) 06:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply