Talk:Ultima Underworld II: Labyrinth of Worlds/GA1

GA Review

{Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: I'll now give the article a spotcheck; the review will follow shortly after. Electroguv (talk · contribs) 13:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS):

• The prose is fine, yet placing "and" after semicolons seems odd to me. The hyphens in the third sentence of the lead will need to be replaced by em dashes.

• Semicolon-and formations are grammatically correct, but they're a bit formal and uncommon on Wikipedia. I don't think they count as a prose issue, though. Changed the hypens to emdashes. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• "Gameplay" section needs a more representative screenshot, methinks.

Overall:

Pass/Fail:

• I am putting the review on hold until the above issues are adressed. Electroguv (talk) 15:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

• Long time no see, Electroguv. Thanks for the review. I'll get a new picture in there as soon as possible. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Welcome back, Jimmy. You've done a great job with this article, as you always do. Hope it'll become an FA someday. Electroguv (talk) 19:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks. And it might—haven't decided yet. Anyway, I got a new screenshot in there. See what you think. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2012 (UTC)