This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Those journals are not accepted around the world enough to be considered as a source for wikipedia. People who know how journals work will recognize such journals that are only published for creating so-called scientific credibility for their funding organizations. Content is also completely biased and provides a political discourse instead of encyclopedic information. Aloisnebegn (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
We would ask you to present alternative viewpoints and incorporate them into the article. A journal does not have to be accepted "around the world", but it can be used to present one side of the story as it does here. Oaktree b (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply