Talk:Umar ibn Ali

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Islam: Muslim history Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim history task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Primary sources

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article us tagged for reliance on primary sources, but they’re not primary. Mccapra (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mccapra! Do you read Arabic? As far as I can see, most of the sources used here are Tabaqat works, which usually are medieval sources (I see Ibn Sa'd's work mentioned) and thus unambiguously primary sources. But perhaps some of these are modern Tabaqat works? Even if so, however, they would only be usable on WP as primary sources: being (in the modern context) a kind of religious literature, they cannot be reliably used as secondary sources. So while an alternative would be to use the {{Unreliable sources}} tag, I think {{Primary sources}} fits the bill best. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 17:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Removing the Shia box

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article is entirely based on unreliable polemic sources. Removing the Shia box and adding a few more relevant tags to the article. Albertatiran (talk) 08:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic