Talk:Umihana Čuvidina

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Picture

edit

I don't think the picture on this wiki is of Umihana... she was born in the 1790s... the first photograph was taken in the year 1826 (she would have been in her 30's) and photography didn't become widespread until the 1840s (she would have been in her 50's)... the woman in the picture looks a lot younger--DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 21:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've had the same concerns. See this discussion. I am not sure what the consensus was. Surtsicna (talk) 21:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't it be best to delete it? We're not sure it's her and it most likely isn't. --DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 15:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Umihana Čuvidina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply