Talk:Unapologetic Bitch/GA1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Azealia911 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 09:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Lead and infobox
edit- Is Madonna credited as "Madonna Ciccone" in the source of the credits, as you've written her name in the writer parameter of the infobox? I'd assume it would have just been "Madonna"
- Split the sentence that starts with "The song's demo was" into two sentences, I'd recommend ending the first sentence with "tracks from the album." and beginning the next with "Its final version"
- "with other twelve tracks" → "with twelve other tracks"
- "final version was" would replacing the word "final" with "mastered" be beneficial here? The leak and the album version sound very similar.
- "with other five tracks" → "with five other tracks"
- "on iTunes store" → "on the iTunes store"
- "as "an early Christmas gift" to avoid more leakage." → "as an "early Christmas gift" to avoid more material from the album being leaked."
- "song was conceived" → "song was created"
- "in more than eight" → "on more than eight"
- "Particularly, "Unapologetic Bitch" is the one closest to Diplo's original sound, having dancehall elements." What exactly does this mean? That the song is very reminiscent of his old work? It comes as a surprise sentence in this paragraph, I'd move it to the second paragraph of the lead, after you discuss the song's genre.
- "as well as on the Billboard's Dance/Electronic Songs." → "as well as on the Billboard Dance/Electronic Songs chart."
- "someone from the audience to participate to the song and giving a banana as a gift." → "a member of the audience on stage to participate in the song's performance, rewarding them with a banana as a gift afterwards."
Background and release
edit- "in some songs" → "on some songs"
- "more leakege" → "more material from the album being leaked."
Composition and lyrics
edit- "production being done" → "production being completed"
- You credit him as Thomas Wesley Pentz for writing, but Diplo for production. Use one.
- "rediscovering her inner strength" is the song specifically tailored towards women discovering inner strength? If not, "their" may be a more appropriate pronoun.
- Unlink Rolling Stone the second time you use it.
Critical reception
edit- Link "Bitch I'm Madonna"
- The A.V. Club should be presented in italics, as should Time. However, Digital Spy should not be.
- Again, unlink Rolling Stone.
- NME should be presented in italics, so should Spin.
Live performances
edit- I'd change the first sentence to past tense, given that the tour ends in two days.
- "the last before the show's encore." could you add what the encore usually is? EG, "the last before the show's encore, "Song title"."
- The second paragraph uses three counts of "Writer of Publication" try and switch it up.
- Link meme.
Charts
edit- Is there no {{singlechart}} for Sweden?
References
edit- #5 – Link Billboard
- #8 – Unlink Rolling Stone
- #10 – Unlink Rolling Stone and remove "| Rolling Stone" from the title.
- #12 – Unlink NME
- #13 – Link Digital Spy
- #17 –
Attitude Magazine
→Attitude
- #21 – Unlink Rolling Stone
- #26 – Unlink Rolling Stone
- #29 – Link Spin
- #38 – Unlink The Guardian
External links
edit- Bonus points if you pander to my OCD and alphabetize the categories
Post-review comments
edit- Thankyou for bearing with me for so long on this review. Don't be put off by the size of issues I found, there's not a single big issue and this is a brilliant article, there's just a few tiny ones with grammar and wording. Might I suggest you submit articles for copy-editing before GA nominating them, because I'd probably have 10% of the comments that I do now. Just a suggestion :) Azealia911 talk 20:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Azealia911, I have addressed all your points and I couldn't be happier with the detailed review comments that you gave. Except one point, which is the italicization of Digital Spy. Per MOS:ITALICS, any artifice with original content, like Digital Spy or maybe Slant Magazine, we would need to treat them as any published content. Hence I kept it as it is. —IB [ Poke ] 13:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Passing :) Azealia911 talk 22:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)