Talk:Unbreakable Machine-Doll

Accident Edit

Not again... Can some please fix it again, sorry again.

Additional Characters

If my grammar are wrong kindly fix it. I will add more in the future.

Can someone put Terminology section

If I edit the whole page < ref > turns to <ref> something like that.

Update

I will update Unbreakable Machine-Doll maybe a month or two. By the way can someone put a Terminology section because when I try to edit the whole page, the <ref or something changes. That's why I can cannot put the Terminology section. Just leave it and I will edit it in the future like I said about a month or two. Below the Charaters section. Thanks in advance.

                                           - April 15, 2014

Unbreakable Machine-Doll Season 2

The second sequel of Unbreakable Machine-Doll is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.95.188.50 (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

• No source given, no indications of this on the official website, nor from their twitter account. Nor have I heard this news elsewhere. I'm removing that section. Feel free to add it back and provide a reliable source if there is one. Kuuderes shadow (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Too many characters

The character list needs to be reduced to only the 13 characters as listed on the official site. If there are other characters that become major characters that aren't listed, then consider creating a separate article. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Its not just that. Someone directly translated the Japanese article and we were left with this atrocious formatting which needs cleaning up somehow. —KirtZ^Message 22:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I'll try to wipe it down to just those 13 for now. Most of the details will be commented out. -AngusWOOF (talk) 00:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

I whittled the list down to the 13-16 characters as listed in the anime official site characters section and staff/cast. Others can be added as knowledge of the light novels are provided, but for now this should start as the base for the whittling down of the character descriptions to sourced material. The other characters are commented out for now. -AngusWOOF (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Nice work there. Since the section (and series!) is basically a character spam it should probably be split to List of Unbreakable Machine-Doll characters in the end. —KirtZ^Message 01:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I am the editor of the Unbreakable Machine-Doll Wikia. Regarding the list of characters: the characters should be transferred to their own article, List of Unbreakable Machine-Doll characters (which I will create), as there are currently about 100+ characters (unnamed characters excluded; they will not be included in the list) in the series. I may also plan to create a List of Unbreakable Machine-Doll terminologies as there are a lot of terms used in the series. Regarding the Unbreakable Machine-Doll article (and the List of Unbreakable Machine-Doll characters article): I plan on filling the articles with information as I progress with the Unbreakable Machine-Doll Wikia. I may take time adding information on the article since I am only the sole editor of the Wikia. As for now, I will only be making minor changes as I have only began with the Wikia. I will also be reverting the excess information placed on the article back to their original forms temporarily. 赤羽 雷真 (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I still recommend that the character list be trimmed to the main characters. http://www.machine-doll.com/character.html shows 13. http://www.machine-doll.com/staff.html shows 18. Since there are hundreds of characters, I would also suggest organizing and grouping the secondary characters as with List of Naruto characters and List of Fairy Tail characters. In other words, some of the secondaries only need a single mention of their name (or not at all) and not a paragraph. As you fill in the list, you can use Ref label or some scheme to refer to the light novels and keep their descriptions to essential information.-AngusWOOF (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm in sympathy with AngusWOOF's opinion because I see no reason to oppose. Plus, I reckon that there is no need to follow the leaf of the "ja wiki[1]", which has multiple issues.--Infinite0694 (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

@{{赤羽 雷真}} Thank you for splitting the characters. If you are familiar with the series, I would agree that you should reference most of the content. However, please do not create a separate terminology list as it will likely be proposed for deletion for notability issues. The series terminology is not important enough to have its own article on the English Wikipedia. —Kirt^Message 17:33, 5 April 2015 (UTC)