Talk:Underground nuclear weapons testing/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Underground nuclear weapons testing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Detection
One thing which should be covered in this article is the issue of detecting underground tests; the issue of whether or not underground testing could be hidden, or could have the yield obscured, or could be detected correctly at all, has been very important since the 1950s or so at least. Just noting that here for future reference. --Fastfission 03:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Good point. There is some information in the Amchitka article on the early work on this. Additionally, Caging the Dragon has some useful material. I'll try to look at this over the next few days, unless someone else wants to do so first. Jakew 14:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Depth
How far underground did they place the bombs? 118.208.209.188 (talk) 11:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- It depends on the device that's being tested, and its expected yield. A large bomb needs to be buried more deeply in order for it to be contained. The largest underground test was Cannikin at the island of Amchitka; that was buried 5,875 feet deep (10.1 miles), and yielded about 5 megatons. Jakew (talk) 13:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Renaming section
It seems that "Early history of underground testing" should be renamed to "Early history of American underground testing". A quick look-over shows that all measurements are in feet, so I assume that this is the case. Esn (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Standing on it!
What would happen if someone stands on the ground of a contained underground nuke like Cannikin? Waist broken? Gibs flying? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.99.164.211 (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Displacement of surface
Can an fully-contained underground blast create an underground cavity without creating a mound on the surface equal in volume to the cavity? If so, how is the mass that once occupied the cavity accounted for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.55.142.146 (talk) 00:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Underground nuclear weapons testing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061014214420/https://www.eh.doe.gov/health/marshall/marsh/journal/rpt-2.pdf to http://www.eh.doe.gov/health/marshall/marsh/journal/rpt-2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Paragraph Breaks
Paragraphs can use some breaking up to improve readability. I will do it on next visit after checking replys to assess agreement. Kyle Andrew Brown (talk) 02:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Underground nuclear weapons testing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509080818/http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/pdf/USGSOFR01312.pdf to http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eespteam/pdf/USGSOFR01312.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.dtra.mil/rd/programs/nuclear_personnel/docs%5CT24299.PDF - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150320072915/https://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull113/11303580312.pdf to http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull113/11303580312.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227073933/http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/effects/effects.shtml to http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/effects/effects.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)