Underneath the Tree has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 29, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Underneath the Tree/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Passing "Music video"; nice, re: copious. Passing "Live performances and usage in media", "Track listing", "Credits and personnel", "Charts", "Radio and release history", "See also".
Note that I review references last, so there may be references I might contest in any of the above sections. -- Zanimum (talk) 16:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Without creating a grossly large heading of "Background, recording and composition", is there any way to merge those two sections? There's so little background, and they seem to flow into each other. Both sections are ready to go, otherwise. I don't need a merge, but if you can think of a logic subject header, it would be well worth it to merge them.
- I merged them as "Production and composition". Please check. Chihciboy (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
"filmed by film director Hamish Hamilton" is repetitive. Also, the only thing he does that is a "film" is concert films. I've changed it.
- Thanks! Chihciboy (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I still have to review the "References" section. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- References are all solid. Good stuff! GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 17:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)