 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Unfair dismissal was copied or moved into Unfair dismissal (Australia) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Separate Australian page
editThe article as it presently stands is unbalanced. The Australian unfair dismissal discussion takes a disproportionately large portion of the article, perhaps due to the Australian context not having its own article, where the UK & France have their own article on the topic.
I propose to keep the article in its current form, excepting to refactor out a portion of the Australian content, into its own Australia-specific article. That way, this general unfair dismissal article will not have content that is unbalanced toward an over inclusion of Australian content; while the information itself be preserved in a linked; specific article.
Any thoughts? Jack4576 (talk) 01:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea to me. Can I suggest that if you write the lead in a way that is a suitable overview of unfair dismissal in Australia, you can use Template:Excerpt to include the text in this article, thereby reducing duplication & maintenance. --Find bruce (talk) 03:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Great. I will give it a go then. Thank you for the helpful suggestion. Jack4576 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have refactored out a bunch of the Australian content into Unfair dismissal (Australia), the Australia-centric content in this article can now be safely reduced in length, without destruction of the contribution to wikipedia. Jack4576 (talk) 05:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
CLC ?
editSame question as in Talk:English contract law#CLC ?. Wisdood (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)