Talk:Unicorn Overlord

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Unicorn Overlord/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 17:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Will take this on in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) Sorry for the wait, here's the review.

Six GA Criteria

1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.

Lead

-Looks good

Gameplay

-"The arrangement of character parties on a grid influencing their abilities and combat efficiency." Could you elaborate on the wording on this?

• Rewrote to be clearer.

Synopsis

-Looks good

Development

-What are the angels? They aren't mentioned anywhere else in the article.

• Put in a bit of exploration/explanation in the story section, so hopefully

Release

-Looks good

Reception

-"When mentioned, the voice acting and music also met with general praise" Needs a typo fix but I'd also axe the "when mentioned."

• Done.

Overall

-Looking pretty good. Just patch up the few things above and this is good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

@Pokelego999: I hope I've addressed everything above suitably. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Looks good. Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)