Talk:Union Station (Los Angeles)

Latest comment: 6 months ago by OrdinaryScarlett in topic Future services module unnecessary

Coast Daylight restoration

edit

Can someone please add the coast daylight to the list of proposed services? I tried to do it myself, but it didn't work. 192.203.40.252 (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Anyone? 2600:4041:7B25:C500:1D7E:C12C:80B2:E95A (talk) 04:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Union Station (Los Angeles)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Union Station (Los Angeles)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "July2020":

  • From Rancho Cucamonga station: Sharp, Steven (2020-07-07). "High-Speed Train to Las Vegas Takes Another Step Forward". Urbanize LA. Retrieved 2020-07-07.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  • From Brightline West: Sharp, Steven (July 7, 2020). "High-Speed Train to Las Vegas Takes Another Step Forward". Urbanize LA. Retrieved July 7, 2020.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 02:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Future services module unnecessary

edit

I personally don't believe that we really need the "Future services" module in the infobox for now. CAHSR has no solid timeline for reaching Union, BLW has not even come close to making any concrete plans yet for expansion further than Rancho Cucamonga, let alone to Palmdale, and even then the implication is that they'd be reliant on CAHSR's completion of two separate phases with again, no clear timeframe of completion at this time. The Metrolink infill stations have no solid timeframe of completion, and even if they did, there is very little justification for including them since they won't substantially affect service patterns. The same goes for the Metro Rail's B and D Line station in the Arts District. As for the Southeast Gateway Line, it isn't forecast to reach Union until 2043. (Though to confess the Metrolink and Metro Rail entries were my contributions.) Its just all around WP:TOOSOON at best and WP:CRYSTALBALL at worst for extensions that may not see the light of day, at least in the forms predicted in this infobox. Thoughts? OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 08:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply