Talk:Union nationale des associations de défense des familles et de l'individu
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Union nationale des associations de défense des familles et de l'individu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rename >UNADFI?
editIt is primarily referred to as such, and is simpler to understand on the English wikipedia... Zambelo (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Sources and original research
editI am tagging the article for use of sources and for original research. Among the sources, we have government websites (WP:PRIMARY sources), lycos user pages (self-published), using Wikipedia itself as a source (not reliable), and a mix of other self-published or associated sources. An example of original research: the article at this time says "The association publishes a magazine named BULLES, which criticizes a large number of groups, including those which were listed in the 1995 report..." - what 1995 report? There is no mention of a 1995 anything anywhere in this article. Tgeairn (talk) 01:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
The 1995 report is the Parliamentary Commission on Cults in France. The 'Lycos page' is a mirror of a magazine. I'll update and remove the template. Zambelo; talk 02:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Union nationale des associations de défense des familles et de l'individu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110304070354/http://www.miviludes.gouv.fr:80/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Miviludes_2006.pdf to http://www.miviludes.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Miviludes_2006.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110612141106/http://www.unadfi.org/IMG/pdf/Les_Mormons.pdf to http://www.unadfi.org/IMG/pdf/Les_Mormons.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120414215110/http://www.unadfi.org/IMG/pdf/Familles_victimes_des_derives_de_la_Communaute_des_Beatitudes.pdf to http://www.unadfi.org/IMG/pdf/Familles_victimes_des_derives_de_la_Communaute_des_Beatitudes.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)