This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I came across this on new page patrol, and I have concerns. I think I've managed to clean it up as much as I am able to; it certainly makes more sense now than it did when I stumbled upon it.
My main concern is the lack of independent 3rd party sources. I was only able to find one independent source about this organization, the one from the Red Cross. That also goes to notability. I'm tempted to nominate this for deletion, especially since I see it's already been deleted twice and salted at a different title [1]. However, this organization may well be more important than it appears to me; I'm inclined to think this is an example of systemic bias since most sources discussing this wouldn't be in English and may be hard for me, at least, to find. Hence the cleanup tags. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving17:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
