Talk:United Nations REDD Programme

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United Nations REDD Programme redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Forestry (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles

Organizations Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger Proposal

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge to new name REDD and REDD+. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I propose merging Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation with United Nations REDD Programme.

I appreciate that REDD and REDD+ may technically be different porgrammes, but given that one is essentially built on and, according to Wikipedia has been superceded by, the other, I think it would be prudent to discuss these programmes in one article (as the Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation is already doing, running the risk of redundancy).

The coverage of REDD and REDD+ across the two articles is confusing, especially to the uninitiated. I propose that the articles be merged into one that can explain the history and differences etc. between both programmes as a cohesive narrative.

Happy to hear arguments to the contrary of course. Looking forward to your responses. TatjanaClimate (talk) 14:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I fully support such a merger. Thanks for raising it. Would you have time to carry it out? What would be the article title in the end? Would it be United Nations REDD Programme or would you proposed in addition a name change? Somehow I find the title Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation quite good although very long so probably not ideal either. EMsmile (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for joining the conversation @EMsmile. I could try find time to carry it out, although help would be welcomed.

Re: article title I'd suggest "REDD and REDD+" with a redirect from both United Nations REDD Programme and Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation searches to this new article. As I understand it, essentially REDD = the multilateral body responsible for REDD+ and REDD+ = the mitigation approach (developed by UNFCCC), so it would be best to drop the word "Programme" from the title.

Support merge I too find this confusing over 2 articles Chidgk1 (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Have to give this proposal a week but ping me if you would like me to do the non-thinking first part of the merge Chidgk1 (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Much appreciated @Chidgk1! TatjanaClimate (talk) 15:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic