Talk:United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231

International relations: United Nations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Iran

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Needs more detail

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Date adopted, vote in UN, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.3.155 (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's all in the infobox. NPguy (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article lends undue weight to a certain side. First of all, accusation of Iranian non-compliance in missile tests is a matter of legal dispute, because the resolution "calls on" –but does not require– Iran to cease test of missiles that are "designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons". While Iran argues that the missiles are not designed to be nuclear-capable [1], Russia says a "call" upon a country cannot be categorically violated [2]. Secondly, the June 2020 report of UN Secretary-General (rejected by Iran [3]) says the arms claimed to be Iranian "may have been transferred in a manner inconsistent" (note to the word may) with UNSCR. These two instances were in a section entitled Iran defection and later Iranian non-compliance which asserts the disputed claims as a fact, favoring a certain view. Moreover, Iran has insisted that the US has breached UNSCR 2231 with its withdrawal from the JCPOA (the same act being described as "gross violation" by Russia [4] and similarly viewed by China [5]) and has filed an ICJ lawsuit against the US, which (so far) led to an interim order in favor of Iran. These are not mentioned in the article at all. The article also dedicates two paragraphs to remarks made by American officials (Pompeo and Abrams) about the "snapback" without mentioning that the US-drafted resolution was quite unanimously (except for the Dominican Republic) rejected by the security council [6], and the American one-side deadline was rebuffed by the rest of the world (including European allies of the US) [7]. That being said, this article has some work to do to reflect a NPOV. I am currently focused on another subject at the moment and unfortunately cannot fix this issue, so I tag the article. Pahlevun (talk) 16:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic