Talk:United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the nuclear program of Iran

Article not needed, lacks coherence

This new article does not have a clear point, and the title reflects this. At the beginning it seems to be about UNSC resolutions on Iran's nuclear program, but there's no need for that (see for example List of United Nations resolutions concerning Iran). At the end it seems to be about U.S. efforts to snap back sanctions, but again there's no need for that (see for example Sanctions against Iran and United States sanctions against Iran). I plan to propose deletion but wanted to raise informally first. NPguy (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@NPguy: The UNSC and the United States resolutions on the Iran Arms is about U.S. Proposal to Extend Arms Embargo on Iran. this article was supported by many RS and independent sources

The Washington Post. Al-Monitor The Guardian The New York Times reuters BBC this article has a good Notability. M1nhm (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

@NPguy: The List of United Nations resolutions concerning Iran covers all resolutions forces by the UN on Iran as well as the resolution is just about Iran's nuclear program, not only Arms. but The UNSC and the United States resolutions on the Iran Arms targets UNSC arms resolutions on Iran and expires in October 2020 based on the 2231 deal.

Sanctions against Iran and United States sanctions against Iran are about all sanctions on Iran forced by the US and other countries but this article includes the US efforts to extend the UN arms embargo on Iran. M1nhm (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

This article is not notable by itself. It is already adequately covered in Sanctions against Iran and does not merit its own article. NPguy (talk) 02:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

fixing

@NPguy: The UNSC and the United States resolutions on the Iran Arms was nominated for Dyk. I try to fix the orphan tag and I link the article on the see also section of other articles but you remove all my Link articles. please explain your reason why do you think need the Link article? M1nhm (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 19:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that on 18 October 2020, all the previous UN arms resolutions on Iran expired based on UN Resolution 2231? Source: reuters
  • ALT1:... that in order to extend the UN arms embargo on Iran, the U.S. released a draft proposal in June 2020? Source: washingtonpost

Created by M1nhm (talk). Self-nominated at 18:39, 4 May 2021 (UTC).

• Not a good article, not well written. I recommend the article for deletion, not citation. NPguy (talk) 02:29, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

General eligibility:

• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Main and ALT verified. Had to click on the link for the text of the full deal to find it. Text could use some copyediting. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

M1nhm I was going to promote this hook, but I had some concerns about the article. This includes direct quotes and paragraphs that are not cited. I placed citation needed tags (and one clarify tag). These concerns need to be fixed before the article can be promoted. Also, I agree with Hawkeye7 that this article could use a copyedit. Z1720 (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Z1720 and Hawkeye7 I requested a copyedit while uploading the article but no one accepted my request. M1nhm (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)