This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Sorry but the information that all US subs built since the Barracudas had angled torpedo tubes is incorect. The Nautalus, the Seawolf (first nuclear one, not the current SSN22) the Seadragon, the S girls (Sipjack, Scamp, Sculpin and Skate) and the B girls (Barbel, Blueback, and Bonefish) along with the first polaris boats all had bow tubes in the front of the bow vice angled tubes.
My Cite? STS 1 SS William M Lehman USN Ret, (that's me) who worked on the Blueback and the S girls, had shipmates on the old polaris boats, and in my current incarnation as a Shipyard worker for Puget Sound Naval Shipyard has cut up a few of the aforementioned vessels under the IRR submarine recycleing program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.167.78 (talk) 03:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply