Talk:United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Markworthen in topic Article's Quality is Now Better than Start-Class

Citation Style for this article: Chicago

edit

I did not discern an established citation style in the article. Since the Wikipedia standard citation templates produce Chicago Manual of Style references (with some minor exceptions), and since Chicago is closest to the standard legal scholarship style, Bluebook, let's stick with the Windy City. I suspect Chicago will be the easiest style for most editors as well. If you disagree, please reply. I have an open mind and this is a consensus process anyway; no dictators allowed. ;-)   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 06:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

By the way, the CMS Cribsheet (PDF) is a very helpful reference for Chicago Style. I learned about it on Wikipedia. :O)   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article's Quality is Now Better than Start-Class

edit

At least that's my humble opinion. I'm a member of WP:USA, and today I changed our Quality rating from Start-class to C-class. I actually think it qualifies for B-class, but I didn't want to leap that far in one hop. I am not a member of WP:LAW or WP:USCJ, so I will not change those two WikiProjects' quality ratings. However, I would encourage any members of one or both of those WikiProjects to consider upgrading this article's quality rating to C-class. // Thank you and "job well done!" to those of you who have worked on this article. I admire the smooth, easily comprehensible prose and the pithy end result. :o)   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply