This article, as it was before my most recent edit, was the result of a merge between a cut-and-paste job from here and another article. Although the text that was cut-and-pasted in was technically acceptable copyright-wise, since it was written by a U.S. government official, I can't see any benefit from having a huge, utterly unencyclopedic cut-and-paste job at the top of the article when we have a decent, if somewhat short, article on that subject down below. Those wishing to incorperate information from that text can simply get it from the source; I don't see how it helps Wikipedia to copy that text over verbatum, even if we technically can get away with it. --Aquillion 22:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
