Talk:United States Navy Seabees Bridge

United States: New Hampshire / Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It just occurred to me

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Since the river is in New Hampshire by fiat, wouldn't all roads on Connecticut River bridges between NH and VT be carrying only the New Hampshire route? - Denimadept (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that is technically true. We can explain that little detail in the article if needed. Nice work by the way on the article. --Polaron | Talk 19:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I just looked up the case. It's VERMONT v. NEW HAMPSHIRE, 289 U.S. 593 (1933). Even found a useful template for citing it. I'll learn to use this Wikipedia thang soon, I promise. :-D - Denimadept (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dang. Did more thinking. The legal cite says the state boundary is at the west side of the river at low water. The bridge goes beyond that point. Argh! - Denimadept (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic