This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
According to United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results, by Michael J. Dubin, the first year Hawaii used districts was in the election for the 92nd Congress. It lists the election of Matsunaga from District 1 and Mink from District 2. I have changed the article accordingly, but please reply to this if I am misrepresenting something, as I assume whoever wrote the article the way it is didn't do so without some sort of source in front of them. - Banyan (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
Latest comment: 3 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion
@WMSR: the previous format of the table was consistent with the two featured lists out of the 50 states, "United States congressional delegations from Utah and Indiana". Could we please revert to the previous format of the table, and remove the unnecessary party key? It unnecessarily convolutes the article. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 19:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC) look at me using the same word twice. I really was flustered. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 20:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Theleekycauldron Hi! I'm certainly open to removing the party key, as making a new customizable template for that is on my to-do list. However it is worth noting that it is difficult to show terms in office using the "sidebar color" format for the Senate, and it can be unclear whether the color bar refers to the officeholder on the left or right at first glance for other larger tables. That said, I can also see how it might improve readability to do away with shading. I am definitely open to a larger discussion of which format is "preferred," and have no issue if you want to revert my edits here until such a discussion occurs. WMSR (talk) 20:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@WMSR: thanks for the flexibility! I'll see where the best place to open an RfC is–probably on the talk page of Wikiproject United States. For now, I think we'll keep it the way it was, but I'm totally open to working with whichever way the RfC goes. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 20:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Theleekycauldron Of course! Same here! I was just trying to standardize the congressional delegation pages, but you're right about MOS:VAR and I don't want to run afoul of any rules. Both styles have advantages and disadvantages, so a discussion seems to be the best way to weigh the pros and cons. Let me know if I can help! In the meantime, I won't convert any pages from one format to the other. WMSR (talk) 20:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
not sure how or why I got pinged in this thread when my name wasn't even shown, but I don't have a particular stance for the linked RFC. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply