Talk:United States v. Elcom Ltd.
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 86.181.48.171 in topic Proposed deletion
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed deletion
editI followed a link from Dmitry Sklyarov to this article to find more information. I discovered almost exactly the same content. this article is thus unnecessary as a redirect to Dmitry Sklyarov would give the same information. 86.181.48.171 (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- You're right about the duplication problem. The best solution I see is to move the case info from Dmitry Sklyarov to here. This is preferable because:
- This article contains more detail
- This article contains references
- Most importantly, multiple parties are involved in this case, so it shouldn't be documented on the page of just one of those parties (e.g. why not just put all the info on the Adobe page?)
- I'll put this on my todo list, but it's a list that moves slowly. Gronky (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- No problem with that. It's just duplication that is the problem. I does not matter which article is deleted. 86.181.48.171 (talk) 10:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The articles over the relevant parties should link here
editI haven't checked if this is the case already, but the articles for each of the parties involved should all link to this article in some way.