Talk:United Synagogue Day School
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
edit- Schools are in general notable, you'll find that precedent has held most decently sized schools are given articles (at 900, this is certainly a large school). Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, the article does assert notability and there is no reason why it shouldn't be kept. -- Chabuk [ T • C ] 00:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Precedent is not uniform on schools, see Wikipedia:Watch/schoolwatch/Schools_for_deletion_archive. Anyway, precedent doesn't set policy (see "This is not policy" at the top of WP:AFDP). Even if all large school articles have been kept, this does not, and cannot, mean that there is consensus that all large schools are notable. Notability means what it says at WP:N, and there's no sign this school meets that. Pan Dan 17:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- This School should meet the notability requirement, as it is one of the largest Solomon Schechter Day Schools in North America and fits perfectly in the category of Conservative Day Schools, as similar schools, even of smaller sizes have been kept.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on United Synagogue Day School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050216083814/http://www.cjnews.com:80/viewarticle.asp?id=4670 to http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=4670
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:26, 17 January 2016 (UTC)