 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
I'm not sure all the information about every "comités" of the AEFA is necessary. Cidolfias —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.213.176.140 (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Sherbrooke is not the only university in Quebec with a joint programm LLB, BCL / MBA McGill offers the same program : http://www.mcgill.ca/law-studies/undergrad-programs/joint/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.68.250.166 (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Coat of Arms of Universite de Sherbrooke.jpg
edit
Image:Coat of Arms of Universite de Sherbrooke.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
overhaul
editI did some thorough overhauling of the page, writing and flag wise. I took out the {{unreferenced}} flag from its section given there was a reference there now, and replaced it with a {{referenced}} flag for the whole article. It's definitely written like an advertisement so I flagged it for that and after some major copy-editing, wherein I realised it's written like an advertisement, I condensed all the flags using {{multipleissues}}
-Alain 24.184.184.130 (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)