Talk:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill/GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


What is a good article?

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Article: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

General

edit
  • Try not to make sentences so passive.
  • Avoid "it" and subst. with a proper noun/collective noun whenever possible

Introduction

edit

History

edit

Images

edit
  • The pictures' captions on the page don't need periods, "unless" they are complete sentences. I don't see any of pictures with captions with complete sentences in this article.  Done Artichoke2020 (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sports

edit

Traditions

edit
  • After important basketball victories, it has become tradition to rush downtown to Franklin Street, which the police shut to traffic.
Who rushes downtown? Students? Faculty?  Done Artichoke2020 (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Campus

edit

School colors

edit
  • You need to give dates/years when the colors were designated these colors. Since the beginning of the athletics department, doesn't work.  Done (as precisely as sources allow) Artichoke2020 (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Scholarships

edit

Comments

edit
Went through the article. Extensive progress has been made. Thus, I am promoting this to GA. miranda 21:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.