Talk:University of Southern California
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Southern California article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | Delta Phi Kappa was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 July 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into University of Southern California. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 May 2020 and 4 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Integrationtool.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Can we use a more modern picture for the logo?
editI looked this up and genuinely thought it was the wrong university. Literally no one ever in history has ever needed the non-modern logo of something, and if they did, that could be listed in the “History” section. I understand copyright issues, but could we just email them or something? Janlopi (talk) 19:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
2024 Commencement
editI'm on mobile currently and won't be able to add this with proper references for a few days, but I think there is a solid argument for including the scandal surrounding the 2024 Commencement Speakers backed up by extensive coverage from multiple outlets, most notably the Los Angeles Times Equirax (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it belongs here just yet. It's not clear if there will be anything that results from this incident except for a bunch of op eds and tweets. If there is something substantive - successful lawsuit, large-scale protests, etc. - then it would almost certainly be something we should mention. But until then there's just not much we can say and it's awfully close to WP:NOTNEWS. ElKevbo (talk) 01:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- alright, looks like the protests have begun. KTLA posting live coverage right now. I'm +1 for information being added to this article but given how the situation is ongoing it might be worth seeing how it plays out. Need to check editing guidelines before I change anything, thanks for the link Equirax (talk) 01:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Center for Transpacific Studies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 24 § Center for Transpacific Studies until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
KXSC-AM deserves its own WP page
editKXSC-AM is notable enough - meaning it has a sufficient number of sources - to warrant its own page. I just made some minor, mostly stylistic edits to this section of the USC page (under Student Media) but gave up after not quite understanding exactly what led to the student-run station after the university changed the original format to classical music. It doesn't help that KXSC-FM's page has zero citations. IMO, these histories need to be sourced and sorted out, KXSC-FM on its page and on a new page devoted to KXSC-AM. I'd appreciate hearing what others think. Allreet (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)