Talk:Unix time/Archives/2017
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Unix time. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Unix time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111112053347/http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5727189.ece to http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5727189.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- The Wayback Machine link didn't work, but the article is still online, so I updated the link. (It's behind Rupert's paywall - which may account for why the Wayback Machine link didn't work.) Guy Harris (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
"Command line" section too short?
I feel like a one-sentence section is not really worth it - could that be merged into another section or could the section be expanded? If not, I think the section should be removed entirely. Thoughts?--──post by AbyxDev ( Talk | Contribs ) 04:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- This is such a key aspect that it seems worth having a section, so that it is very easy to find. But it seems like it should be fleshed out more, with examples?-73.61.15.1 (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
example good - decoder wanted
The prominent real-word example of actual CurrentTime near the beginning of the article is a very good feature. But not being able to find a link to a working online decoder is frustrating...-73.61.15.1 (talk) 18:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Ooops - the current link at the end of the article to * /unixtimestamp.ru/ redirects to
- unixtime.guru
which does work, but is somewhat tricky/frustrating.
- www.epochconverter.com
does work
- TimestampConvert.com
also does work.-73.61.15.1 (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)