Talk:Unorthodox Behaviour

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

eno

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

i've reversed the initial statement about eno, which claimed that the title track on this disc was "based upon an eno track" (paraphrase). i've done so for a few reasons.

1) the same musicians played on both records.
2) eno was not a musician and always admitted as much.
3) the records were recorded virtually simultaneously.
4) if you do the research - even here at wiki - you'll see that large amounts of the work that eno produced in the 70s was based around repeatedly sampling the rhythm section of brand x.
5) a future eno track - energy fools the magician - would draw upon parts of the same track.

all of this leads to the conclusion that the similarity in the two tracks reduces to work that originated with the members of brand x and not with the non-musician mind of brian eno. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.121.196 (talk) 10:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic