Talk:Until August

Unconnected Spanish version of this article

There is an extensive Spanish version of this article. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_agosto_nos_vemos . Sorry, I don't know how to connect them. LlanitoSheep (talk) 14:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 17:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Gabriel García Márquez asked his sons to destroy Until August, but they instead published it after his death? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/06/books/gabriel-garcia-marquez-last-novel-until-august.html?action=click&pgtype=Article&state=default&module=styln-books-general&variant=show&region=BELOW_MAIN_CONTENT&block=storyline_flex_guide_recirc
  https://www.npr.org/2024/03/06/1236246186/gabriel-garcia-marquez-novel-until-august-published
  • ALT1: ... that the fourth tallest building in Colombia lit up in honor of the publication of Gabriel García Márquez' posthumous novel Until August? Source: https://www.eltiempo.com/bogota/imagenes-alusivas-a-la-novela-inedita-de-gabo-iluminan-la-torre-colpatria-de-bogota-3321955
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Anchusa officinalis
  • Comment: 3rd DYK nomination by Jaguarnik, no requirement for DYK review

5x expanded by Jaguarnik (talk). Self-nominated at 16:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Until August; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ:
Overall: needs QPQ. Primary hook reads better than the secondary hook, IMO Ryan shell (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Ryan shell - QPQ was not required, as it was only my third nomination; however, I have done a DYK review for another article. Jaguarnik (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)